CNN is running with the shocking headline, “Cheney: No link between Saddam Hussein, 9/11.”
The quote: “I do not believe and have never seen any evidence to confirm that [Hussein] was involved in 9/11. We had that reporting for a while, [but] eventually it turned out not to be true.”
Gosh, if only Cheney would have said something sooner…
Russert: Do we have any evidence linking Saddam Hussein or Iraqis to this operation?
Cheney: No.
Russert. [I]s there a connection?
Cheney: We don’t know. You and I talked about this two years ago. I can remember you asking me this question just a few days after the original attack. At the time I said no, we didn’t have any evidence of that. Subsequent to that, we’ve learned a couple of things. We learned more and more that there was a relationship between Iraq and al-Qaeda that stretched back through most of the decade of the ’90s, that it involved training, for example, on BW and CW, that al-Qaeda sent personnel to Baghdad to get trained on the systems that are involved. The Iraqis providing bomb-making expertise and advice to the al-Qaeda organization.
We know, for example, in connection with the original World Trade Center bombing in ’93 that one of the bombers was Iraqi, returned to Iraq after the attack of ’93. And we’ve learned subsequent to that, since we went into Baghdad and got into the intelligence files, that this individual probably also received financing from the Iraqi government as well as safe haven.
Now, is there a connection between the Iraqi government and the original World Trade Center bombing in ’93? We know, as I say, that one of the perpetrators of that act did, in fact, receive support from the Iraqi government after the fact. With respect to 9/11, of course, we’ve had the story that’s been public out there. The Czechs alleged that Mohamed Atta, the lead attacker, met in Prague with a senior Iraqi intelligence official five months before the attack, but we’ve never been able to develop anymore of that yet either in terms of confirming it or discrediting it. We just don’t know.
RUSSERT: Well, I asked you, I said, “is there a connection between Saddam and 9/11 on September ‘03” and you said “we don’t know.”
CHENEY: (Unintelligible). That’s right.
RUSSERT: So you raised that possibility.
CHENEY: It was raised by the CIA who passed on the report from the Czech Intelligence Service.
RUSSERT: All right. Now the president has been asked, “What did Iraq have to do with the attack on the World Trade Center?” and he said “nothing.” Do you agree with that?
CHENEY: I do. So it’s not…
RUSSERT: So it’s case, case closed.
CHENEY: We’ve never been able to confirm any connection between Iraq and 9/11.
The Bush administration said this again and again and again, but the Leftist media still continues to hear only what it wants to hear.
Newsbusters has more quotes.
Cheney better stay out of the sun. Doesn’t he know that sunshine kills vampires? He better go back to the dark.
Stick with the Original story Dick, WMD’s in Iraq…
How can the media be “leftist” when it’s owned by wealthy republicans?
So then, why the hell did we attack Iraq and kill Saddam Hussein? What the F..K was the purpose of having so many of our soldiers killed. Why did we go there?
Gayest blog ever. If there was no connection between Saddam and OBL, why did we invade Iraq? Way to confront the real issue. And newsbusters sucks ass.
Oh please, Dick, please. Go hunting, shoot a friend, but shut the F### UP! Nobody cares what you think!
[...] » BREAKING NEWS FROM 2001, 2003, 2006, etc.Posted 9 hours [...]
Not so fast, Mick.
Both Bush AND Cheney pimp’d the alleged intelligence ties between Mohammed Atta (9/11 highjacker) and meetings with Saddam’s intelligence operatives, meetings that have never been proved to have taken place.
Just because Cheney wouldn’t go on record and say it on Meet the Press, doesn’t mean he never said it.
TP — Cheney did “go on record” on MTP about the Atta intel, as you would have observed had you actually read this post.
The bigger story was the recent Cheney lie that torture “saved hundreds of thousands of lives.”
When we have two CIA station chiefs and a top military interrogator that say it’s lie… then it’s lie.
Further, Bush Cheney tortured not to save lives, but for political reasons - to try and prove that fictious 9/11–Iraq link.
I see you’ve thrown out the Cheney strip and attracted some flies, Mick.
Why is it that so many people can’t get their minds around the difference between “Saddam had contacts with al Qaeda”, which he did, and “Saddam pulled off 9/11″, which there’s no evidence of? It’s as if IQ’s suddenly dropped after 9/11, making some incapable of the least amount of Googling required to read the Resolution for Use of Force.
Cheney riles people up because he’s refuses to believe the false conventional wisdom created around something of which he was an integral part.
Oh thanks, Mick! I love it when the Cheney-monkeys come out. Mention his name, and they start shrieking, crying, and poop flinging.
Good times.