Archive for the ‘Tennessee Politics’ Category

WHAT WILL THE TEA PARTIERS DO NOW?

Sunday, May 24th, 2009

wendi_c_thomas_tweet

Leftist media types were eager to discredit the Tea Party protesters who assembled on Tax Day earlier this year to voice their objections to rampant government expansion, exponential deficit spending and the burdensome tax increases to follow.

Commercial Appeal Metro Columnist Wendi C. Thomas posted an update on Twitter, reporting that she was “driving past the Tea Party in Memphis,” but still felt qualified to offer a judgment based solely on the gathering’s signage and skin color. Apparently the Rush Limbaugh phrase “drive-by media” is literally true.

Upon confrontation, Thomas refused to elaborate and attempted to silence criticism by blocking access to her status updates. It was a curious move, since her Twitter account is prominently advertised on the newspaper’s website and can still be viewed publicly, even without logging into the site.

In another display of willful ignorance, the Memphis Flyer’s Jackson Baker wrote that the gathering was “a nationwide Fox News-generated ‘protest’ against — just what?”

Without bothering to lift a journalistic finger or attempt to actually discover anything resembling a set of facts concerning the event’s genesis or purpose, Baker was content to consult only his own crusty, ideologically-biased assumptions. That’s how he determined that the Memphis Tea Party “was as much a gathering of cranks and ideologues responding to a news conglomerate’s marching orders as it was a bona fide conclave over the issue of taxation.”

In an adjoining report, Flyer colleague Chris Davis amended this allegation and downgraded Fox’s role, saying it had only an “apparent, if not actual, partnership” with the event’s organizers.

Davis attended the rally long enough to document some homespun signs and photograph a young man wearing an offensive t-shirt. If these rather embarrassing props seemed to lack the polish of a rally professionally staged by the nation’s top cable news network, this was lost on our intrepid alt-weekly reporter.

But Davis reportedly took an early leave from the Memphis Tea Party on orders from an “aggressive middle-aged woman” who allegedly commanded him to put away his recording equipment. She must not have detected the other 999 people doing likewise, since everyone else was allowed to stay at the free and open event, held in a public park.

Is that really all it takes to rid ourselves of biased journalists? She apparently accomplished more with one well-deserved scolding than thousands have been able to achieve with frustrated letters to the editor, canceled subscriptions and general contempt for the entire floundering news industry.

While the media was busy peddling these deliberately misinformed notions to its dwindling readership, state and federal legislators were preparing their own assault — new tax bills unwittingly tailor-made for the tea party activists to expose and defeat.

Now we wait to see if they, like the Boston radicals before them, are determined to turn a grievance into a real political movement.

For more on that topic, see my editorial in the upcoming June issue of the Main Street Journal (subscribe online).

A BURDEN THAT THE PEOPLE WANT

Tuesday, May 19th, 2009

Here’s just a little taste of what I’ve been researching recently:

More to come…

A (MARKET) MARKET FAILURE?

Monday, March 23rd, 2009

It’s been a while, so I thought I’d post the article I wrote for the February edition of the Main Street Journal:

A local Democratic activist recently found that Memphians living in some of the city’s poorest areas have essentially no access to healthy food. The limited food products available in these neighborhoods are “processed with high levels of sodium and high fructose corn syrup,” contributing to epidemics of “Type 2 Diabetes, Strokes, Heart Disease and Obesity.”

“There has been a market failure, and it is causing a health care crisis,” writes Frank Burhart, a graduate of both Rhodes College and the University of Memphis, who blogs under the alias Polar Donkey (polardonkey.blogspot.com).

Burnhart’s signature issues are social inequality and wealth distribution, and his blog posts are frequently illustrated by maps he creates using geographic information system (GIS) software.

To punctuate his argument about the unequal distribution of healthy food access points around the Memphis area, Burnhart plotted grocery stores and liquor stores and overlaid them with maps of zip codes by population, median household income and food stamp recipient totals.

Burnhart discovered three poor zip codes in particular – 38106, 38107 and 38108 – that combined for a total of 18 liquor stores but not a single major chain grocery store, Easy Way or Save-A-Lot. These he contrasted with the wealthy Cordovan zip code of 38018, which contained four grocery stores and only two liquor stores. By his calculations, the ratio of people to liquor stores was markedly different, as well, with twice as many liquor stores per capita in the poorer areas.

These findings led Burnhart to the conclusion that the city of Memphis had it in for poor people and that “local government should step in and regulate food sales / distribution.”

There are some problems with Burnhart’s analysis. For one thing, he under-represents the population in 38018 by at least half, meaning the ratio of people to liquor stores would actually be four times larger in Cordova. But that’s only if you accept his assertion that there are only two area liquor stores, when a cursory web search reveals at least five. Additionally, Google lists some 28 grocery stores in 38107 alone, and while many of these are actually dilapidated convenience stores without much selection, there’s at least one Save-A-Lot (999 Jackson Ave), though Burnhart specifically claimed there were none.

Still, the overall thrust of his point remains unanswered: is our society trying to starve and mistreat poor people, keep them sick and inebriated?

Much more likely, it’s a problem of simple economics. Store owners, shareholders and investors build and maintain stores in safe locations where they can turn a profit and sell as many products as possible, not in areas where the crime rate is out of control and the residents can’t keep them in business. Would you rather open a store in a zip code with a median household income of $74,000 or $22,000?

But if an abundance of liquor stores is any indication, it must be profitable to run some businesses in these areas. So we’re left to wonder what would happen if Tennessee reformed its wine and liquor laws to allow grocery stores to sells these items, as they do in 18 other states. Perhaps that’s one way major chain grocery stores could be enticed to do business in impoverished areas, sparing us all of more government regulation.

Which is another reason to support the wine in grocery stores bill.

WIDGETS, SPROCKETS AND COGS

Monday, March 16th, 2009

Bill has an exclusive license to sell widgets, as long as he never sells widgets to populations that are forbidden from purchasing them. Bill is not allowed to sell sprockets, which go nicely with widgets, and he’s definitely not allowed to sell cogs.

Bob sells cogs and sprockets, but he’s not allowed to sell widgets, and he’d like that to change. Bob says he’d be more than happy to maintain the same widget-selling rules concerning forbidden populations, and in return he’ll help Bill change the rules so he can sell sprockets.

Bob has asked George, Gerald, Greg, Gabriel, Gary and Grant to speak on his behalf:

  • George says widget customers would appreciate having easier access to widgets at Bob’s store and sprockets at Bill’s store.
  • Gerald says Bob already prevents the forbidden populations from buying widget-like items in his store, so the same will hold true if he starts selling widgets.
  • Greg says widget prices would be more competitive if Bob was allowed to sell them.
  • Gabriel says both Bill and Bob are losing business to Brian, who has a store just across the state line.
  • Gary says people in other states look at us weird, because people like Bob have always been allowed to sell widgets where they live.
  • Grant says it’s a free country, Bill and Bob should be allowed to sell whatever they like, widgets, sprockets, cogs or all three.

But Bill is having none of that, so he’s enlisted Randy, Ryan, Roscoe, Ralph and Rudolf to help scuttle the rule change:

  • Randy says he’s afraid Bill will go out of business if Bob starts selling widgets. In order to save Bill’s business, we’ve got to preserve his exclusive license.
  • Ryan says he’s afraid that the forbidden populations will have more access to widgets if Bob starts selling them. And they would probably harass Bob’s customers in the parking lot.
  • Roscoe says if people want widgets, they know where to go.
  • Ralph says Bill does better things with his sales revenue than Bob does.
  • Rudolf says he sympathies with Bob’s request in the generic sense, but he personally doesn’t like widgets, so he’s torn.

I personally wouldn’t buy widgets from Bob or Bill, but I agree with Grant.

If you’re with me, join the movement.

TIDBITS II

Thursday, February 26th, 2009

* Last year, they told us they couldn’t find a way to cut $14.5 million from the Shelby County budget. This year, Mayor Wharton has proposed $18.5 million in budget cuts. Draw your own conclusion.

* Leftists writing at the Commercial Appeal, Smart City Memphis, Polar Donkey, Mediaverse and elsewhere piled on Rep. Brian Kelsey (R-Germantown) for suggesting that Tennessee reject the stimulus funding from Washington. But most of the criticism focused on Kelsey’s style and didn’t even begin to address the substance of his proposal. Also, that was before Gov. Phil Bredesen suggested the same thing. I’m still waiting for the eloquent 5-word post from Polar Donkey calling the Democratic Governor a “whore” and a “douche bag.”

* Rep. Kelsey’s Democratic colleagues responded by threatening legislation that would block any stimulus money from reaching districts represented by legislators who vote similarly. Sounds like a great idea, provided taxpayers in those districts (and their grandchildren) are similarly exempted from bearing the accompanying tax burden. If both sides of the equation are included, we could get behind a major expansion of that philosophy, covering most legislation. Bring it on!

THE KURITA COMPARISON SMOKESCREEN

Saturday, January 17th, 2009

Some parting thoughts on the Rep. Williams imbroglio…

I know Rep. Campfield has already addressed the comparisons to Sen. Rosalind Kurita at Camp4me, but I would put it this way:

1. Sen. Kurita voted with the majority, affirming the will of Tennessee voters; Rep. Williams voted with the minority, negating the will of Tennessee voters.

2. Sen. Kurita voted for a member of the other party; Rep. Williams voted for himself.

3. The deciding vote for Senate Speaker was technically not cast by Sen. Kurita, since a RINO Senator also voted for Ramsey (who won 18-15); the deciding vote for House Speaker was cast by Rep. Williams (who won 50-49).

4. The Democrats disenfranchised voters by voiding Sen. Kurita’s primary victory and installing Tim Barnes undemocratically; without disenfranchising voters, The Republicans will aid the democratic process by blocking any future attempt by Rep. Williams to conceal his true party loyalties.

Instead of Rep. Williams, wouldn’t a much better comparison to Rosalind Kurita be the 49 House Democrats who voted for a Republican as Speaker?

Or is there something about their vote for the Republican victor that is less traitorous than Kurita’s vote?

Why no outrage from the Left this time?

A SPARE SPIDERMAN COMIC?

Friday, January 16th, 2009

Rep. Kent Williams: liar.

THE TRUTH LIES IN THE MIDDLE

Tuesday, January 13th, 2009

When I told some people about the TN Speaker vote this afternoon, in which a RINO was backed by 49 minority Democrats and himself to snatch victory from the majority Republicans, a coworker of mine invoked an increasingly popular cliche, “the truth lies in the middle.” Since Kent Williams is nominally in the “middle,” he must represent “truth.”

So if Johnny says the sky is blue and Sally says the sky is yellow, the sky must be green.

RULES FOR RINOS

Tuesday, January 13th, 2009

THE OPEN SELECTION PROCESS

Thursday, December 18th, 2008

The Tennessee Republicans have done an excellent job opening up the State Constitutional Officers selection process to the public. The Tennessee Senate Republican Caucus has even posted the applications and interview videos to its website. But I thought this little bit of censorship on page one of Tre Hargett’s application was curious:

Particularly since his resume on page seven includes this:

Perhaps the State Government will be hiring a new censor, too?