Archive for February, 2009

TIDBITS II

Thursday, February 26th, 2009

* Last year, they told us they couldn’t find a way to cut $14.5 million from the Shelby County budget. This year, Mayor Wharton has proposed $18.5 million in budget cuts. Draw your own conclusion.

* Leftists writing at the Commercial Appeal, Smart City Memphis, Polar Donkey, Mediaverse and elsewhere piled on Rep. Brian Kelsey (R-Germantown) for suggesting that Tennessee reject the stimulus funding from Washington. But most of the criticism focused on Kelsey’s style and didn’t even begin to address the substance of his proposal. Also, that was before Gov. Phil Bredesen suggested the same thing. I’m still waiting for the eloquent 5-word post from Polar Donkey calling the Democratic Governor a “whore” and a “douche bag.”

* Rep. Kelsey’s Democratic colleagues responded by threatening legislation that would block any stimulus money from reaching districts represented by legislators who vote similarly. Sounds like a great idea, provided taxpayers in those districts (and their grandchildren) are similarly exempted from bearing the accompanying tax burden. If both sides of the equation are included, we could get behind a major expansion of that philosophy, covering most legislation. Bring it on!

TIDBITS I

Thursday, February 26th, 2009

* Barack Obama gave the biggest speech of his presidency, and all people are talking about is the Republican response. The next day, CNN splashed negative reviews (of Gov. Bobby Jindal), a critique of one statement (by Bobby Jindal), and a negative editorial (on Bobby Jindal). Nothing on Obama’s speech. Meanwhile, the Memphis Flyer’s Chris Davis makes a fool of himself attacking Bobby Jindal, which I suppose is like making water out of H2O. Didn’t Barack Obama make any news? Does anyone remember a single thing he said?

* The Dems keep implying that the conservatives can’t criticize all their insane deficit spending and outrageous earmarks because the GOP allowed both during the last administration. So, according to the Dems, are deficits and earmarks good or bad? As long as they can distract you with this BS about conservatives being hypocrites, they pretend to be free from answering the question or giving an account for their actions.

* This is already horrible, but how much worse would this chart look if Washington included the unfunded obligations and money shifted from Social Security into the general fund?

* I looked back to see when it was that I first questioned the direction of our economy and the possibility of a recession. It was October 30, 2007.

The Democrats had been saying for years that we were already in a recession (we weren’t) and the Republicans said there wasn’t one on the way (there was). The recession officially started about a year later, in the third quarter of 2008.

But when did the Dow peak? The stock market high was October 2007, and the DJIA has only gone south since, losing 6700 points, or 48%.

I wrote that post at the exact moment the shift occurred. Where do I go to claim my prize?

OPEN LETTER TO THE SHELBY COUNTY COMMISSION

Monday, February 23rd, 2009

To the honorable members of the Shelby County Commission,

I would like to take this opportunity to commend you for the brave vote you cast today in filling the open seat in District Four.

I cannot imagine how hard it must be in circumstances such as these to put aside the best interests of your party in order to measure the pulse of this community and select a candidate who represents our interests, and adheres to the same philosophically conservative tradition as Commissioner Lillard.

The thought that you would put our interests ahead of your own warms our hearts, and the fine example of bi-partisan camaraderie you have displayed restores our faith in the democratic tradition of this fine governing body.

On days such as these, all citizens of Shelby County can rest easy knowing that our civic affairs are being handled by public servants who are doing their utmost to protect and defend our diverse thoughts and values and ensure that everyone has a seat at the table.

In the days and weeks ahead, I would urge you to push back any second thoughts you may have about this vote you have cast, for you can be sure that above all else, you did the right thing. Sure, some may question your decision, but since your vote was grounded in principle rather than politics, you will have the confidence that flows from honest pursuit.

This bright moment will not be soon forgotten, for you have shown all of us that there is something greater than politics, greater than your own personal interests, and greater than Machiavellian power grabs — representative governance.

Again, thank you for the bold stand you made today, and for seeking out the common ground that invites us all to put aside our differences and share in the unity of civic pride.

Warmest regards,

Mick Wright
Bartlett, Tennessee

THE ANTI-STIMULUS

Friday, February 13th, 2009

In July, Congress passed a tax credit for home buyers purchasing their first homes between April 2008 and July 2009. Taxpayers could claim the $7,500 credit, but would have pay it back over the next 15 years.

This month, Congress decided to extend the offer through the end of 2009, increase the credit to $8,000 and strike the provision requiring it to be paid back for homes purchased in 2009.

Another proposal, passed unanimously in the Senate but removed by the joint conference, would have upped the credit even further, to $15,000, and would have allowed any home buyer to claim it (not just first time home buyers). This amendment did not make the final cut, but the proposal’s sponsor said he will continue to push for the increase tax credit in a separate, stand-alone bill.

Each of these proposals are intended to spur home sales and quickly pump money into the housing market. Instead, by continually upping the ante, Congress actually discourages home sales. The signal that this activity sends to potential home buyers: hold out for a better offer.

And that’s not even addressing the question of whether such credits actually help the economy in the long run, or what might be the net effect of a temporary, artificial boost in demand.

All we really seem to know is that we’ve got to pass something, anything, no matter what it is, and now matter how bloated and foul, as quickly as humanly possible.

We’ll pay for it later.

UPDATE: “U.S. Home sales drop as many wait to see how tax credits will help market… Buyers ‘did not want to jump into the market until they were certain’ what the government would do to resuscitate the housing market, said Lawrence Yun, chief economist for the Realtors’ trade group.” Commercial Appeal, Feb 26.

A PUBLIC SERVICE

Tuesday, February 10th, 2009

Our President says the federal government will “save or create” 4 million jobs by borrowing roughly $800 billion and spending it on random programs and projects.

If blowing money on widgets can save jobs, why can’t blogging?

Therefore, I declare that this blog post will save or create 4 million jobs. If you had a job when you started reading this blog post, and you still have a job when you finish reading it, consider your job saved.

No thanks necessary.

LUNCH AT THE CORNER CAFE

Saturday, February 7th, 2009

Every work day, you go out for lunch and eat at the Corner Cafe. You have budgeted $5 each day to spend on your lunch. Meals at the Corner Cafe cost $6, so you borrow $1 from the restaurant, which has set you up with a line of credit. At the end of the week, you’ve spent the $25 you budgeted, plus your tab of $5. If you skip lunch one day next week, you can pay off this week’s debt.

When Monday rolls around, instead of skipping lunch and settling your debt, you hatch a clever idea. You take an important colleague to lunch with you; if you are able to impress this colleague, you could advance your career and earn more money. And if your financial situation improves, your lunch budget will increase enough to pay the $6 each day, plus your $5 debt from last week.

For a week straight, you treat this colleague to lunch at the Corner Cafe, for a total daily cost of $12. You pay by spending $5 from your lunch budget and adding $7 to your tab. At the end of the week, you’ve spent $25 and added $35 to your debt. At your current salary, you’ll have to skip lunch for seven days to pay back the restaurant for this week’s tab.

Well, to make a long story short, your colleague enjoys the free lunches but doesn’t come through for you. On Monday, you feel the burden of that big debt at the Corner Cafe, but your stomach is rumbling and you need lunch in order to stay focused and do your job. You’ve got to eat, and you’ve got to make more money.

You decide to invite two of your colleague’s closest friends to lunch with you. Perhaps they will be able to influence this colleague or tell you how to get your point across. After lunch, the Corner Cafe brings you the bill, but the manager is starting to question your ability to pay off the tab, so they’re going to start charging you interest. At the end of the week, you charge $65 to your tab, plus 10% interest, for a total of $71.50, if you pay by Monday.

Before long, you realize that your colleague’s friends don’t seem to have any more influence than you do, and you still have to pay off that debt. Around lunch time, you go to the manager at the Corner Cafe and confess that you don’t have the money, and what’s worse, you’ve actually been borrowing half of your lunch budget from your retirement account. The manager tells you not to worry, he’ll put you on a generous payment plan.

He also suggests that you start getting politically active and support candidates who will pay for your lunch, guarantee you a “living wage,” and take care of your retirement account. What could possibly go wrong?