Democrat Presidential nominee BRCK BM is not telling the truth about American family incomes.
Here he was in Davenport, Iowa, on Monday:
“When Bill Clinton was President, in the ’90s, the average family income went up $6,000. Since George Bush has been in office, the average family income has gone down $1,000.”
He said the same thing a day earlier, on Aug 24: “Under George Bush, it has gone down $1,000. It is not just people’s imagination that they are feeling pinched. There is more money going out and less money coming in.”
On Tuesday, BRCK BM doubled the figure: “Since 2000, since George Bush took office, the average, typical family income has gone down $2,000. Typical family income has gone down $2,000. When Bill Clinton was president, the typical family income went up $6,200.”
That’s change you can believe in.
Er, maybe not so much.
According to the Census Bureau historical income tables, the median family income decreased only $272 between 2000 and 2007, not $1,000 or even $2,000.
And by “decreased only $272,” I actually mean increased by $272. In fact, the median family income has risen to the highest level in American history as of 2007 (the last recorded year), and I’m pretty sure George W. Bush was in office that year, not Bill Clinton.
And since Bush wasn’t actually in office in the year 2000, last time I checked, the median family income has actually risen $1,149 under his Presidency. Pretty remarkable, given that we also weathered a dot-com bust, a major terrorist attack, natural disasters and various other national and global financial disturbances in that span.
Why isn’t BRCK BM telling the truth?