In a speech to “1,000 abortion rights supporters” yesterday, Hillary Clinton “drew gasps from some in the audience by mentioning that 7 percent of American women who do not use contraception account for 53 percent of all unintended pregnancies,” according to the New York Times.
If Senator Clinton wants her party to find ‘Common Ground‘ on abortion and “[propose] new political language about abortion rights for the Democratic Party,” she could start by sending a memo to her pals at the Associated Press.
Note the exclusively-negative terms used for pro-life advocates (postive terms) in these two recent AP articles posted at CNN.
Rallies mark Roe v. Wade anniversary
- abortion opponents
- anti-abortion marchers
- anti-abortion demonstrator
- anti-abortion activists
- abortion opponents
- abortion opponents
- Abortion opponents
Bush speaks by phone to anti-abortion protesters
- anti-abortion protesters
- Anti-abortion marchers
- abortion foes
- anti-abortion activists
- opponents… of abortion rights
- who oppose the Roe decision
- abortion opponents
This exclusive negativity spills over into the headlines and cutlines:
On the other hand, Catholic World News notes an “enormous improvement” in this area at the San Francisco Chonicle.
***
For someone seeking a change in course, Senator Clinton is singing a familiar tune: “I for one respect those who believe with all their heart and conscience that there are no circumstances under which abortion should be available.”
Sounds like John Kerry during the second Presidential Debate: “First of all, I cannot tell you how deeply I respect the belief about life and when it begins.”
That’s why this makes no sense:
Mrs. Clinton is widely seen as a possible candidate for the party’s presidential nomination in 2008, and her remarks signaled that she could be recalibrating her strong identification with the abortion-rights movement as the Democratic Party engages in its own re-examination of its handling of the issue in the wake of Senator John Kerry’s loss in the 2004 presidential race.
Re-examination in the wake of defeat? Let’s see another side-by-side comparison.
Clinton: “friends and foes on the issue should come together on ‘common ground’ to reduce the number of ‘unwanted pregnancies’ and ultimately abortions… “The fact is, the best way to reduce the number of abortions is to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies in the first place.”
Kerry: “it’s important for the United States, for instance, not to have this rigid ideological restriction on helping families around the world to be able to make a smart decision about family planning. You’ll help prevent AIDS. You’ll help prevent unwanted children, unwanted pregnancies. You’ll actually do a better job, I think, of passing on the moral responsibility”
Clinton: “Mrs. Clinton also called today for the Bush administration, religious groups, supporters and opponents of abortion rights and others to look beyond the abortion rights divide and form a broad alliance on other issues that she suggested as less incendiary: sex-education programs for teenagers that included abstinence education, emergency contraception for women who have recently had unprotected intercourse, and family planning.”
Kerry: “Now, I believe that you can take that position and not be pro-abortion, but you have to afford people their constitutional rights. And that means being smart about allowing people to be fully educated, to know what their options are in life…”
In my estimation, the two speakers are interchangeable. That’s not re-examination, that’s re-iteration.


